SCImago Journal & Country Rank

This paper delves into the intricate relationship between anticipatory epistemic injustice and the discourse surrounding religious radicalism in Indonesia. Recognizing that the anticipation of radicalization plays a pivotal role in shaping public perception and government policies, this study critically examines how epistemic injustices manifest in the framing of religious radicalism within Indonesian society. This study underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing anticipatory epistemic injustice in discussions surrounding religious radicalism in Indonesia. By promoting fair and just discourse, grounded in evidence and sensitivity to cultural and religious differences, we can contribute to a more balanced and effective approach to countering extremism while upholding democratic values and human rights.

Key words: radicalism, epistemic injustice, epistemology, hermeneutics

DOI: 10.22250/20728662_2024_2_179

Download the paper (PDF)

About the authors

Risalatul Hukmi – PhD student in the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Sydney, Australia; Junior Lecturer in Philosophy at Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia; 69HJ+F8P Jl. Olahraga, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 Taufiqurrahman – Junior Lecturer in the Faculty of Philosophy at Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia; 69HJ+F8P Jl. Olahraga, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.